This is an outrageous story. Women didn’t dine with men as a rule the culture of Jesus. The men would gather for the meal and the women would eat in the kitchen. Besides that, Jesus was an important teacher. This would likely have been a special event. But that didn’t stop this particular woman. She broke into the dinner party, uninvited, to pay her respects to Jesus. Her unannounced entry into a room full of men was outrageous. To make matters worse, she next broke open a very expensive bottle of oil (perhaps some kind of perfume or lotion), and lavished all of it upon Jesus. Besides the fact that she broke into this “men only” dinner and went right up to Jesus and touched him, she wasted a lot of money! That is what really seems to have gotten people’s attention, the waste of money!
We read that the oil she used to anoint Jesus cost about one year’s worth of wages. That may not translate easily for us so just think in terms of an average person, not a wealthy person, and what they make in a year. The reason I say that is it probably makes the act more outrageous. Someone like Donald Trump can blow through one year’s wages for someone special. Trump could blow an entire year’s wages and while we would think that outrageous, Trump would never miss the money because he has so much. On the other hand, normal working class people are really going to miss one full year’s worth of wages, even if it is given for a worthy cause. But if it is just dumped on someone’s head, well, that is outrageous. The good people present remark that the oil could have been sold for the equivalent of on one year’s wages and used to feed the poor. Instead, this party crashing woman just dumps a year’s worth of wages all over Jesus.
Of course, we do read later, in verse 8 that she is anointing Jesus for his burial. In spite of that, people are critical of her for being so extravagantly generous! They criticize her for doing something meaningful for Jesus! The extravagance of her action toward Jesus is alarming to those who witness it. Apparently she has seen something in Jesus that she feels compelled to respond to in a very dramatic way.
Perhaps she sees in Jesus the extravagant grace of God being lived out. Perhaps she sees in Jesus radical extravagance that ultimately leads him to give his entire self away for others (see Philippians 2.5-11). She obviously wants to do something in return for Jesus so she blows an entire year’s wages on this one symbolic act, anointing him for his burial, in advance. She wants to respond to him and what he is doing and she doesn’t care what others think of her for doing so. Her generosity is outrageous. It is called wasteful.
When people questioned her judgment they said that the oil should have been sold and the money used to feed the poor. Jesus responds by saying that they will always have the poor with them but they won’t have him around much longer. This statement has caused some trouble for the church because it seems to indicate that we will never eliminate poverty, according to Jesus. That may be one way to look at the matter. Another way may be to read the statement as Jesus saying that we will always have ample opportunity to be generous toward others in the future!
Can you imagine being so generous as to have people question your judgment? Can you imagine being so generous that people question whether or not you are acting in your right mind? While I do know very many very generous people, I don’t know anyone who has been so generous at any one time as to be considered lacking in judgement. I don’t run around with the types of people who can just give away one entire year’s salary in one act of generosity!
Could anything or any one inspire you to give away that much money at one time? Think about it. Is there anything or anyone that could possibly inspire you to be that generous? I am not even sure that Jesus inspires that kind of generosity from people today.
Some people do give large sums of money to churches or other religious and charitable organizations. But those are not “average” people. Those are people who can give away that much money precisely because they don’t miss it.
Christians sometimes lean too heavily on the understanding that “Jesus paid it all”, and so all we have to do is believe. Does that mean, though, that Jesus paid it all so we don’t have to do anything? We are taught that grace is free. There is nothing we can do to merit grace. We certainly cannot purchase it. It does come through faith in God through Jesus. Jesus gave his life for the sake of others. That isn’t something we can repay. But, does that mean we don’t respond? How do you respond to God’s generosity toward you?
Think of generosity not as repayment to God or Jesus for what they have done for you. Think instead about generosity as response rather than repayment. None of us can ever repay God for the gift of life and all its blessings. We can though respond to God’s generosity by acting in similarly, though. God was so generous with Jesus as to change the course of world history. Surely then there must be some way that we can be generous that would startle our friends and neighbors. I am not saying that you need to do something foolish like give away a full year’s salary. But how many of us ever think about cultivating an attitude of generosity that is so bold it makes people sit up and notice that living our faith as response to God really matters?
Posted by Paul Parlow on November 9, 2011 at 8:39 am
As I read your blog I was struck by the fact that the woman responded and gave to a person–not an organization, cause,or what have you. Her generiosity was for and toward a person.
Posted by William Bills on November 9, 2011 at 8:50 am
That is a very good point, Paul. We often demonstrate generosity through intermediaries, be they people or institutions. Sometimes people will do that because the want to remain anonymous. Often, though, we don’t have or take the time to actually be with those who are in need. Sometimes we don’t really want to associate with them, either. Sometimes those who most need our generosity are dirty, smelly, live in shelters, nursing homes, or other places we don’t want to go. It can be clean and easy to write a check and give it to someone else. That is a good thing to do, of course. On the other hand, it can help us to keep from going to poor neighborhoods or from speaking to the down and out. Direct is good. It causes us to really encounter the person we are generous toward.
Posted by Peter Rienstra on November 9, 2011 at 12:27 pm
It is amazing how generous people become after a disaster hits an area.People seem to react more neighborly and give time and talent and food and money and love.
I think that people have really lost their interest in going to the same old neighborhoods and donating food and clothes to the same people all the time because the people there do not attempt to help themselves.The politicians have stolen their incentives with promises they can not keep or even intended to keep. . The best generosity would be to give them tools and teach them how to use them. . I do not think a person would be very welcome if you tried this approach.
Posted by Paul Parlow on November 9, 2011 at 12:43 pm
I agree with your comments above. A go-between is often needed to get the job done. I just did not want the other point to be missed. It is one of these both/and situations.
Posted by lizarye on November 10, 2011 at 8:05 am
I’m interested in this concept you bring up, Peter, about people not wanting to give to the same old people who remain in the same situation because they won’t help themselves…. and Bill, how it is much more sanitary and easy to write a check. There is the idea that you can just throw some money at people and then sit back and expect them to become what you want them to be. And the belief that money should be given only if there is control over where and how it will be used, to be sure that the recipient is deserving. Both ignore God’s desire for us to release what he has given us, be it money or grace, in the name of love. We can give the money, and then follow up with time and effort and a sympathetic ear to help establish God in someone’s life. This takes some getting dirty and so much patience before we see God’s result, which may not be the result we had in mind. It’s about letting God move through us….. our greed is the clog to the flow!
Posted by William Bills on November 10, 2011 at 10:10 am
How do we deal with the statement in the gospel attributed to Jesus that says, “The poor you will always have with you…”
Lisa, I think that some people do write checks so that they can know that they have helped. Some even say it makes them feel good. They have often have no direct experience in ministry with the poor. Often there does have to be an intermediary such as The United Methodist Committee on Relief or The Salvation Army. On the other hand, someone who writes a big check every year to God’s Kitchen, while doing a good thing, can be excused from ever encountering the poor or being in ministry with them. There is a difference to being in ministry to someone and being in ministry with someone. Think about the recent Hands Across the City Event. I could have written a check for $100.00 and stayed home and watched sports on TV. I could have felt good about that. I think it is more important, though, that I got off the couch and went to the city and worked along side the people I was hoping to help.
Posted by lizarye on November 10, 2011 at 12:59 pm
Wow, now that I read my post it sounds entirely cynical. I guess what I was harping on was the (mistaken) notion that when we give something, it should remain under our power or control. I had a college professor who said, “When you give something, take your hands off it.” I don’t think there is anything wrong with anyone writing a check and I think God will use any donation any way he can get it. But, there are people who won’t give because they are afraid that their gift will be wasted, according to their personal version of waste. They can’t take their hands off of their gift and have faith that if God asked them to give it, it won’t be in vain. I’ve heard people say they won’t give to panhandlers because they are afraid that what is given will be misused. However, the person doing the giving misuses his own money in many foolish ways. He expects the recipients of his gift to be perfect in order to be worthy of his generosity and forgets how unworthy he is to have been blessed with that income to begin with (or how unworthy we were when Jesus claimed us as His). At our house we do write some checks, and we also do some joining in. When I write that check, I have to remind myself that the money came from God and since HE asked me to give it, I have a guarantee that it will work towards HIS purpose. I think this might be what you preached on Sunday. If so, Amen!
Posted by lizarye on November 10, 2011 at 1:08 pm
And now that I re-read that post, it sounds entirely haughty. I get fired up about this issue because I really think that if we all got this right…what God wants of us and our belongings, it would turn this world on its ear. So, if I sounded like I think I got it all figured out, I don’t! God had to pound me to a pulp to get me to do what I do, and there is sooooo much more to be done!
Posted by William Bills on November 10, 2011 at 6:24 pm
Not a problem!
Posted by lizarye on November 13, 2011 at 5:09 pm
Pastor Bills, I wanted to tell you this morning how much I appreciate this study/series. I marvel at how you and the church staff dive headlong into such controversial affairs. It is all very heady stuff for me and if I sound gushy, I don’t care. I know you all work hard and I just want to say thanks. Thanks!
Posted by William Bills on November 14, 2011 at 6:33 am
I can take a toll sometimes, Lisa.
Posted by lizarye on November 15, 2011 at 8:48 am
I’ll bet. That’s why I designated myself GUMChurch cheerleader. Keep it up!
Posted by Peter Rienstra on November 15, 2011 at 12:05 pm
One person is not always suited to do everything but each one can do something . . When we bring all the talents together they as a team can accomplish much. We as a church have many talented people and that is why we exist.